Le 19/12/2017 à 18:08, Michael Siegel a écrit :
> The point I was trying to make there, was that the way the article
> states those facts is misleading, not that they are actually untrue. It
> just really provokes the question "So, why use Devuan at all?" in kind
> of a strange way. And as a whole, it gives a wrong impression of what
> Devuan is.

    I agree on this point. When reading this article you get the
impression that Debian offers you all freedom and Devuan just offers
less (systemd). Therefore what's the point of installinf Devuan?

    In this article, like in the french one (which is better though),
systemd is falsely treated as if it was just an init system. This is the
major fallacy which still needs to be denounced.

        Didier