On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 02:06:11PM -0600, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> * On 2017 11 Dec 10:13 -0600, Didier Kryn wrote:
> > This is the original saling argument, but it is wrong. Several persons
> > have already reported that Devuan's sysvinit booted faster than
> > Debian's systemd.
>
> It seems that as SD subsumes more and more services it would naturally
> slow down. Especially when one considers that the replaced services
> have been around for years, or even decades and are likely quite well
> debugged and optimized

partly because they were written when performnce was critical because
they had to be usable on the slow small machines of decades ago (they
were the fastest then avilable).

-- hendrik