Edward Bartolo wrote on 12/12/17 07:30:
> On 11/12/2017, golinux@??? <golinux@???> wrote:
>> On 2017-12-11 14:06, Nate Bargmann wrote:
>>> * On 2017 11 Dec 10:13 -0600, Didier Kryn wrote:
>>>> This is the original saling argument, but it is wrong. Several persons
>>>> have already reported that Devuan's sysvinit booted faster than
>>>> Debian's systemd.
>>>
>>> It seems that as SD subsumes more and more services it would naturally
>>> slow down. Especially when one considers that the replaced services
>>> have been around for years, or even decades and are likely quite well
>>> debugged and optimized while the SD replacements are new code with a
>>> lot
>>> maturation needed.
>>>
>>> - Nate
>>
>> And since the "bugs" are often considered wontfix "features", don't
>> expect it to get any better.
>>
>
> Those are not "bugs" but new features. That is the reason for "wontfix".

Run along, Wally. Let the grown-ups talk.