On Mon, 2017-12-04 at 09:53 +0100, Jaromil wrote:
> On Sun, 03 Dec 2017, Svante Signell wrote:
>
> > However, I'll do the renaming as we  decide on.
>
> I understood well your intention and it makes sense to me, but if we'd
> want to introduce such a (big) change to the way versioning is done,
> then it need to be considered for every package.
>
> Right now I doubt we need to introduce such a big change and if
> proposed I'd advocate for adding a new Field: in the package header
> rather than the versioning string.

Now being renamed to 3.2.2-9 from 3.3.3-8+devuan2.

Parazyd, please find the attached patch for the renaming.
From 1983a1745416e40e4834e4fc1a1b344de2fc6879 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Svante Signell <svante.signell@???>
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2017 13:28:11 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Rename package to 3.2.2-9. No need for +devuan2, being
redundant.

---
debian/changelog | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 45cdbd2b9..c28835148 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+eudev (3.2.2-9) experimental; urgency=medium
+
+  * debian/changelog:
+    - Change package name to 3.2.2-9. No need for +devuan2. It is redundant.
+    - Fix typo in previous changelog entry: 3.2.2+8+devuan2 -> 3.2.2-8+devuan2
+
+-- Svante Signell <svante.signell@???>  Wed, 06 Dec 2017 13:09:23 +0100
+
 eudev (3.2.2-8+devuan2) experimental; urgency=medium

[ Svante Signell ]
--
2.11.0