On Sun, Dec 03, 2017 at 06:39:03PM +0100, Jaromil wrote:
> On Sun, 03 Dec 2017, Daniel Reurich wrote:
>
> > Eudev being a directly packaged should have a version of <upstream
> > version>-<build version> and not have an additional +<devuanX.Y> which is
> > currently only used for our modified rebuilt version of debian packages.
> > So the correct version should be 3.2.2-9 in this case.
> >
> > For updates, we can add +<suite version>u<N>, and backports +bpoN, and
> > security can have +<suite or suiteversion>securityN
> >
> > In this way we follow the same convention as debian uses, and provide a
> > clear indicator where we override a debian package.
> >
> > Of course this is all up for discussion, but I suggest until we can decide
> > on and document a good reason to break with this convention we should do
> > so.
>
> I tend to agree with Daniel here, since this package is not forked
> from Debian we don't need to add +devuan. Lets hear more opinions.
>
I agree with Dan and Jaromil. If something is not forked from Debian,
we don't need to use the +devuanX.Y convention, IMHO.
HND
KatolaZ
--
[ ~.,_ Enzo Nicosia aka KatolaZ - Devuan -- Freaknet Medialab ]
[ "+. katolaz [at] freaknet.org --- katolaz [at] yahoo.it ]
[ @) http://kalos.mine.nu --- Devuan GNU + Linux User ]
[ @@) http://maths.qmul.ac.uk/~vnicosia -- GPG: 0B5F062F ]
[ (@@@) Twitter: @KatolaZ - skype: katolaz -- github: KatolaZ ]
::
Re: [devuan-dev] New patches for eu…
