On Sun, 03 Dec 2017, Daniel Reurich wrote:
> Eudev being a directly packaged should have a version of <upstream
> version>-<build version> and not have an additional +<devuanX.Y> which is
> currently only used for our modified rebuilt version of debian packages.
> So the correct version should be 3.2.2-9 in this case.
>
> For updates, we can add +<suite version>u<N>, and backports +bpoN, and
> security can have +<suite or suiteversion>securityN
>
> In this way we follow the same convention as debian uses, and provide a
> clear indicator where we override a debian package.
>
> Of course this is all up for discussion, but I suggest until we can decide
> on and document a good reason to break with this convention we should do
> so.
I tend to agree with Daniel here, since this package is not forked
from Debian we don't need to add +devuan. Lets hear more opinions.
ciao