On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 05:43:16PM +0300, Hleb Valoshka wrote:
> On 11/29/17, KatolaZ <katolaz@???> wrote:
> > Just to make it clear, the recommendation for renaming debian packages
> > is to be found here:
> >
> > https://wiki.debian.org/RenamingPackages
> >
> > where you can read:
> >
> > "Note that the package does not contain any architecture specific
> > files anymore and therefore the Architecture is set to all, even if it
> > was any before."
> >
> > So it seems that using Architecture: all is totally legit, well, even
> > recommended.
>
> This page seems to be outdated, it was created in pre-multiarch era
> and was never properly updated.


It says it was updated pretty recently, though:

RenamingPackages (last modified 2017-08-06 08:59:49)

I am really trying to understand here.

My2Cents

KatolaZ

-- 
[ ~.,_  Enzo Nicosia aka KatolaZ - Devuan -- Freaknet Medialab  ]  
[     "+.  katolaz [at] freaknet.org --- katolaz [at] yahoo.it  ]
[       @)   http://kalos.mine.nu ---  Devuan GNU + Linux User  ]
[     @@)  http://maths.qmul.ac.uk/~vnicosia --  GPG: 0B5F062F  ] 
[ (@@@)  Twitter: @KatolaZ - skype: katolaz -- github: KatolaZ  ]