On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 05:50:20AM -0600, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> * On 2017 10 Nov 02:40 -0600, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:
> > Nate Bargmann writes:
> > >I've also used Procmail for an
> > >equal length of time and it is now claimed to be "unmaintained".
> >
> > Who claims that?
>
> Some months back I was looking for some tips on a recipe and seem to
> recall comments to that effect.
>
> A quick check shows Wikipedia asserting the same:
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Procmail

I've just edited that article to be less biased. Please check if the new
tone sounds neutral, and improve it if not.

Note: there indeed was one security vulnerability, but it was discovered in
2014, while all the "it's dead" brouchacha happened years before.


Meow!
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Laws we want back: Poland, Dz.U. 1921 nr.30 poz.177 (also Dz.U.
⣾⠁⢰⠒⠀⣿⡁ 1920 nr.11 poz.61): Art.2: An official, guilty of accepting a gift
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ or another material benefit, or a promise thereof, [in matters
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ relevant to duties], shall be punished by death by shooting.