I like to think of systemd as the lazy man's solution to init.  I am not
really a developer persay, but you guys seem to convey what I just said
and what I am about to say,

systemd slogan, "*IF it isn't broken*... *Break IT!*"

Also another slogan for systemd: "*The**Donald Trump**of **Init*!"

and last but not least, "*The lazy Developer's way out!*"

but seriously, is laziness really the only reason so many distros
switched to systemd?

If so... that is frankly in the words of the orange unstable man of hot
air: "*SAD*!"

*):*

On 11/01/2017 08:57 AM, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 08:24:34PM -0400, Taiidan@??? wrote:
>> There is always one reason or another for "a start job is running for -
>> network interfaces/disks/etc)" which halts the entire boot process
>> "faster", even without those it still is much slower than devuan.
> Wow! Systemd even halts faster!
>
> -- hendrik
> _______________________________________________
> Dng mailing list
> Dng@???
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng