On Wed, 25 Oct 2017, KatolaZ wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 11:31:36AM +0100, KatolaZ wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 12:13:27PM +0200, Ivan J. wrote:
> >
> > [cut]
> >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > We don't need to break ascii. We can put it in ascii-proposed-updates.
> > >
> > > ascii-proposed-updates aren't the default repo, meaning we can't do a
> > > proper debootstrap ensuring eudev is pulled in. Furthermore,
> > > ascii-proposed-updates have a NotAutomatic stanza in the Release header.
> > >
> >
> > OK, but AFAIU the problem is with updates/upgrades, not with new
> > installs, right?
> >
>
> well, if udev remains in the repos, then the problem is also for new
> installs, obviously....

My point exactly. We need to ditch the existing udev for the new
transitional package most probably.

--
~ parazyd
GnuPG: 03337671FDE75BB6A85EC91FB876CB44FA1B0274
GnuPG: https://parazyd.cf/FA1B0274.asc