Trying again. What's wrong?

Sent from my Samsung device

-------- Original message --------
From: "svante.signell" <svante.signell@???>
Date: 20/10/2017 18:52 (GMT+01:00)
To: devuan-dev@???
Subject: Fwd: Re: [devuan-dev] Actions from last meeting



Sorry wrong list email address.

Sent from my Samsung device

-------- Original message --------
From: "svante.signell" <svante.signell@???>
Date: 20/10/2017 18:48 (GMT+01:00)
To: devuan-dev@???
Subject: Fwd: Re: [devuan-dev] Actions from last meeting



Forwarding from another mailer in my smartphone. Maybe it works this time 


Sent from my Samsung device

-------- Original message --------
From: Svante Signell <svante.signell@???>
Date: 20/10/2017 18:39 (GMT+01:00)
To: Svante Signell <svante.signell@???>
Subject: Fwd: Re: [devuan-dev] Actions from last meeting

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Svante Signell" <svante.signell@???>
Date: 20 Oct 2017 17:43
Subject: Re: [devuan-dev] Actions from last meeting
To: "devuan developers internal list" <devuan-dev@???>
Cc:

I've already supplied an eudev version renaming libudev* to libeudev* but it was rejected by parazyd. I'ts just a matter to revert to that version. Currently I'm afk so that patch has to wait until next week, if I would do that. But I think that version can easily be retreived by parazyd,  if he is willing to do that. (And if the renaming is a decision we all agree upon) 

There is no reason to set an epoch at all.



the package should not build or ship libudev... but libeudev and have:

"Provides: libudev1 (=<libudev version>)

"Replaces: libudev1



This allows a drop in replacement for libudev without the name conflict

and provides a seemless transition to eudev.