What failed in Debian was the votation count method (1+1+1 < 2)


El 14/10/17 a les 09:19, Edward Bartolo ha escrit:
> Although this belongs to devuan-dev I am posting this here for general
> discussion.
>
> I think, the principle should hold indefinitely as anyone working on
> Devuan's projects, is doing it for free in their free time. Since
> there is no payment involved, it makes a lot of sense to keep some
> form of motivator. In this case, such a motivator, would be more say
> in decisions.
>
> Please, understand this email is NOT intended to push myself to have
> more say: that would be above my head, as I have absolutely NO
> experience besides with the most common equipment found at homes.
>
> Another point to state is, to repeat that unanimity, is important
> where major changes to Devuan are involved. This point has been
> criticised as the stalling policy of the EU, but needless to say,
> every policy has its downside. It is better to have slow progress
> rather than have schisms occurring as a result of deep disagreement.
> This has happened to Debian notwithstanding of its well-planned
> structure.
>
> I attribute the changes taking place in GNU/Linux in general,
> especially the introduction of systemd, to business forces placing
> their fingers where they shouldn't. Devuan should guard itself to
> create a structure that impeaches any member that acts in ways that
> would undermine the Devuan ideal in the long run. I think, Debian
> suffered what it suffered because it allowed members/developers with
> questionable backgrounds and design preferences.
>
> edbarx
> _______________________________________________
> Dng mailing list
> Dng@???
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
>