Dear KatolaZ,

I'm willing to move forward for the good of Devuan, and am happy to work
with you.

Your post below indicates misgivings about your ability to work with me.
If that is the case you might need to consider whether your nomination
for the CTTE (or what ever it is called) at this time is going to be
conducive to the good functioning of that body.

With regards to the various issues you have highlighted, I'm sure that
if we put our heads together in collaboration we can devise an approach
and tooling to resolve them.

Regards,
    Daniel.

On 10/10/17 21:20, KatolaZ wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 12:50:44PM +1300, Daniel Reurich wrote:
>
> [cut]
>
>>
>> But technical skills is secondary here, primary is being able to assess
>> impacts and ensure appropriate granting of permissions, and we have
>> consensus to proceed on infrastructure implementation proposals before
>> plans are set in stone. Also being able to step guide people before
>> they build complete solutions to what they perceive are problems, and
>> that includes saying. No, that's not what we need, not to block them
>> developing, but to stop them creating a huge distraction as we had with
>> scorsh.
>>
>> You'll have to note, that I'm not an acedemic, and thus tend to take the
>> attitude that whilst we should allow people broad scope to make and
>> learn from their mistakes, we can't allow unbridled experimentation on
>> our core infrastructure especially when our focus should be on getting a
>> release out. There are always exceptions to the rule.
>>
>>
>
> It is finally clear that your problems (with me) are essentially
> personal and political, rather than technical. You might have better
> made this clear a few months back, instead of continuing throwing shit
> and vomiting technical nosense. Be reassured: I don't give it a toss.
>
> I remain available to serve Devuan, if I can be useful in any way. I
> can also pass over to anybody else the administration of some or all
> the services I have access to, if their majesties believe that their
> trust was misplaced and someone else can serve the cause better.
>
> I just would like Devuan to move forward, as many other peope here. I
> would like AntoFox to be able to build his damn 90+ MATE and Cinnamon
> packages into the Devuan repos without me having to move any single
> damn repo to the devuan-packages group from that ugly gitlab
> interface, and having to issue the damn hundred builds by hand, one
> after the other, waiting 5 minutes every time only to know whether
> jenkins liked the job or not. I would like people to not remain stuck
> because one or two other people must enter in every single damn little
> aspect of Devuan.
>
> For me Devuan has always been like Stalingrad, order 227: Not one step
> back.
>
> HND
>
> KatolaZ
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> devuan-dev internal mailing list
> devuan-dev@???
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devuan-dev
>


--
Daniel Reurich
Centurion Computer Technology (2005) Ltd.
021 797 722