On 2017-10-10 17:28, Ralph Ronnquist wrote:
> With the shortness of seats, I think I would like to pull Evilham in
> front of me (if he's not already there), as I find his organizational
> thinking and acting miles better than mine.
>
> Ralph.
>

Ralph,

You are non-negotiable IMO.

golinux

> Patrick Meade wrote on 11/10/17 08:29:
>> On 10/10/2017 12:35 PM, golinux@??? wrote:
>>> On 2017-10-10 09:00, Evilham wrote
>>>>
>>>> Agreement when it comes to who these 5 people are is also lacking.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I had not had a chance to chat with Evilham since I nominated him at
>>> last week's meet until yesterday. He has indicated a willingness to
>>> participate as a member of this group so I am here re-nominating him.
>>
>>
>> I will second the nomination of Evilham.
>>
>> I think every person nominated shares the same basic vision for
>> Devuan,
>> as well as the same basic values. As such, I wouldn't be disappointed
>> to
>> see any of them elected to stewardship.
>>
>> I would, however, be disappointed if Evilham were not elected to
>> stewardship. His email to the list on this topic radiates honest and
>> calm leadership. I think that even if there was a bitter divide over
>> something, that I could trust him to learn the relevant facts and make
>> an honest call.
>>
>>
>>> testament to their suitability. That being said, I do have a slight
>>> concern about two positions of the 5 coming from within Dyne if for
>>> no
>>> other reason than an appearance of having an inappropriate influence
>>> on decisions.
>>
>>
>> I have no concerns about the Dyne organization itself. I agree with
>> its
>> core values and see it as Devuan's life line; the going concern that
>> will host and sustain Devuan as contributors at every level come and
>> go.
>> For this reason, I feel it would be fair for Dyne to have two voices,
>> but I hope that Dyne will limit itself to one voice in order to tap
>> the
>> strength that comes from a diversity of viewpoints.
>>
>> blinkdog
>>