With the shortness of seats, I think I would like to pull Evilham in
front of me (if he's not already there), as I find his organizational
thinking and acting miles better than mine.

Ralph.

Patrick Meade wrote on 11/10/17 08:29:
> On 10/10/2017 12:35 PM, golinux@??? wrote:
>> On 2017-10-10 09:00, Evilham wrote
>>>
>>> Agreement when it comes to who these 5 people are is also lacking.
>>>
>>
>> I had not had a chance to chat with Evilham since I nominated him at
>> last week's meet until yesterday. He has indicated a willingness to
>> participate as a member of this group so I am here re-nominating him.
>
>
> I will second the nomination of Evilham.
>
> I think every person nominated shares the same basic vision for Devuan,
> as well as the same basic values. As such, I wouldn't be disappointed to
> see any of them elected to stewardship.
>
> I would, however, be disappointed if Evilham were not elected to
> stewardship. His email to the list on this topic radiates honest and
> calm leadership. I think that even if there was a bitter divide over
> something, that I could trust him to learn the relevant facts and make
> an honest call.
>
>
>> testament to their suitability. That being said, I do have a slight
>> concern about two positions of the 5 coming from within Dyne if for no
>> other reason than an appearance of having an inappropriate influence
>> on decisions.
>
>
> I have no concerns about the Dyne organization itself. I agree with its
> core values and see it as Devuan's life line; the going concern that
> will host and sustain Devuan as contributors at every level come and go.
> For this reason, I feel it would be fair for Dyne to have two voices,
> but I hope that Dyne will limit itself to one voice in order to tap the
> strength that comes from a diversity of viewpoints.
>
> blinkdog
> _______________________________________________
> devuan-dev internal mailing list
> devuan-dev@???
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devuan-dev