著者: Jaromil 日付: To: devuan-dev 題目: Re: [devuan-dev] Nominations for Devuan Council (Re: Notes - Devuan
meet Oct. 04/05 2017)
On Tue, 10 Oct 2017, Daniel Reurich wrote:
> > Therefore in light of current nominations I am in now favor of
> > having a new 5 person leadership that drives Devuan forward and
> > establishes priorities, composed by me and Daniel as remaining
> > leaders and then Evilham, Ralph and Parazyd as new leaders, with a
> > total 5 quorum 3 on votes when needed. > I'd be happy to have Ralph, and Evilham or fsmithred added to the
> leadership, but prefer nextime to remain, provided he will weigh in
> when a deciding opinion is sought.
OK then lets agree on this and move forward please.
This endless political discussion makes absolutely no sense to me,
while its getting close to manipulation and misuse of language:
> Jaromil, I hope we can reach a consensus that doesn't throw nextime
> under the bus,
I have never wanted to throw anyone under the bus, and nextime of all
people! as I've mentioned already he told me he has no time for the
project but would like to remain included. Now as others do here, I
believe that:
1) 'leadership' should entail active inclusion
2) exclusion from this 'leadership' doesn't mean 'under the bus'
knowing this, now lets just scale down this incredible dramatic tones
and take an executive decision to move forward on the many tasks that
parazyd is patiently posting here.
yesterday we were trying to attend also with ralph and katolaz in a
quiet and productive atmosphere on #devuan-infra, until you come to
make ad-personam statements and start playing politics. Lets not make
that happen again please!!!
To conclude: I do believe either parazyd or katolaz should be included
in the 5th as active leads because of their overview and team playing
skills and I believe that your exclusion of active people connected to
the Dyne community is purely political. But for the good of the Devuan
project we should all be ready to get over this madness and move
forward to call this a reached consensus, since this is really not a
plot and we just need to get things done.
If there are no more objections then please lets proceed to distribute
root access to the 5 people in charge and lets work in peace and
harmony towards ascii and towards strengthening the infrastructure
which right now has some rather ridicolous vulnerabilities.