On Mon, 18 Sep 2017 10:21:18 +0100, KatolaZ wrote in message
<20170918092118.GH23169@???>:

> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 10:29:35AM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
>
> [cut]
>
> > >
> > > I haven't replied for a while. but yeah your probably right.
> > > Devuan is better as is. I would definitely though that being
> > > said, hope to make a not pure rolling release, but one with a
> > > stability in the middle of stable and testing, and then one for
> > > unstable and experimental...
> >
> > ..one early blunder we did, was fork off Debian Jessie rather than
> > Debian Wheezy, a lot of good people we could have used here, got
> > stuck there because they are conservative and slow because they
> > get paid to prioritize stability.
> >
> > ..we could help bridge that "Debian-Wheezy-to-Devuan-Jessie" gap
> > with a _minimal_ "Devuan Wheezy 0.x" fork, if that isn't too much
> > water under the bridge now...
>
>
> Dear Adrnt,
>
> there is no gap at all between Debian Wheezy and Devuan Jessie. You
> can safely upgrade form Debian Wheezy to Devuan Jessie, as explained
> also in the Jessie Release notes. This is probably the most relevant
> link:
>
> https://git.devuan.org/dev1fanboy/Upgrade-Install-Devuan/wikis/Upgrade-to-Devuan
>
> HND
>
> KatolaZ
>

..excellent, we're getting there. :o) Now, can we get the
mirror upgrade-to-Devuan as good?
I have a partial Debian mirror we can use as a guinea pig.


--
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
Scenarios always come in sets of three:
best case, worst case, and just in case.