On 2017-09-07 08:01, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-09-07 at 14:11 +0200, Antony Stone wrote:
>> On Thursday 07 September 2017 at 13:59:01, Narcis Garcia wrote:
>>
>> > This thread has now 86 posts, and I still don't see a solid contribution
>> > to Devuan project.
>> > This makes very heavy to be subscribed in a mailing list for people like
>> > me, that are looking a good alternative to Debian/Systemd, not only in
>> > software but also in community.
>>
>> I'm strongly inclined to agree.
>>
>> Perhaps we could have something like a "devuan-discuss" list for the 
>> philosophy and the disagreements, leaving this list for discussions
>> actually 
>> directly related to developing or using Devuan?
>
> Yes, please! Even if some messages are interesting, a majority of them
> are off-
> topic for Devuan. This list should concern user feedback, etc. For pure
> development there is already list for that: devuan-dev.
> _______________________________________________

LOL! We had a devuan-discuss list and almost nobody used it so it was
removed. Unlikely we'll go there again. Search the archives for the
discussion about that event. It started here:
Date: 2016-11-06 07:59 -600
To: dng
Subject: [DNG] devuan-discuss is not useful, quite the opposite

More lists is not a solution for poor judgment on the part of list
participants who always try to have the last word in some ridiculous
hair-splitting debate that is often off-topic.

golinux