:: Re: [DNG] Purism Librem and disabli…
Página superior
Eliminar este mensaje
Responder a este mensaje
Autor: Taiidan@gmx.com
Fecha:  
A: Alessandro Selli, dng
Asunto: Re: [DNG] Purism Librem and disabling Intel ME: it can be done [ Re: TALOS 2 - The Libre Owner Controlled POWER9 Workstation/Server ]
On 09/07/2017 04:30 AM, Alessandro Selli wrote:

> On Wed, 6 Sep 2017 at 17:12:27 -0400
> zap <calmstorm@???> wrote:
>
>> Agreed! Talos is at least *LIBRE!*
>    No, it ain't:
> https://blog.rapid7.com/2013/07/02/a-penetration-testers-guide-to-ipmi/

>
>     "BMCs and the IPMI Protocol

>
>     Baseboard Management Controllers (BMCs) are a type of embedded
>     computer used to provide out-of-band monitoring for desktops and
>     servers. These products are sold under many brand names, including HP
>     iLO, Dell DRAC, Sun ILOM, Fujitsu iRMC, *IBM IMM*, and Supermicro
>     IPMI."

>
>    IBM stuff is plagued by embedded controlware, too.

Uhh no it is
There is a major difference between ME/PSP and IBM's POWER-BMC - One is
open source and owner controlled the other two aren't.

On 09/06/2017 07:18 PM, Alessandro Selli wrote:

> On 06/09/2017 at 19:15, Taiidan@??? wrote:
>> On 09/06/2017 06:36 AM, Alessandro Selli wrote:
>>
>>>     The steep price.

>>>
>> Uhh the laptops you guys are selling now cost just as much as TALOS...
>    "you" whom?  I am not a seller.

You are constantly defending them and snubbing your nose at superior
products so it is obvious you work for purism.
>> only they aren't owner controlled.
>    That you know of.  I remember IBM has always been one of the top USA
> military's purveyors:

>
> http://newspaperarchives.vassar.edu/cgi-bin/vassar?a=d&d=miscellany19700206-01.2.13
>
> "In fiscal 1909, IBM contracted for $257,000,000.00 worth of its
> products with the United States Department of Defense. 4 The importance
> of IBM's military role has grown with the computerization of the
> American war effort in Vietnam." (1909 is probably an OCR error, there
> are many in the piece; it could be 1969).
>
>    I very doubt material from IBM can be thought of being
> freedom-and-liberty loving and exempt from any governmental-friendly
> "features".  They just don't put it in their public spec sheets like
> Intel does.

Ahh oh well shucks looks like I had better buy a purism right? at least
then I know for a fact that there is a hardware level backdoor and can
act accordingly!