On 2017-08-24 01:58, Evilham wrote:
> Devuan Notes Aug 23/14 2017 @20:30 UTC
>
[cut]
>
> >>>> jaromil . . . At the risk of volunteering Evilham without
> asking
> first, I would like to suggest that you give him access to update
> the website according to your current method. He and I work well
> together. Then you will be relieved of that aggravation and the
> website will benefit for having the most current information.
> Seems like a win/win all around. (golinux) *
> * I'd be ok with this; may look into replicating the pipeline
> locally at some point before Wednesday, that way a chrooted
> SFTP-only access to update the site would suffice (evilham) *
>
[cut]
> * And this document on decisional structure is informative.
>
> https://git.devuan.org/devuan/devuan-project/wikis/DecisionalStructure
>
> >>>> jaromil - I have never seen the list of VUAs involved with
> Devuan.
> Are they the owner members here?
>
> https://git.devuan.org/devuan/devuan-repository-masters/settings/members
> Many of them are unknown to me. At this point in our development, I
> am not comfortable with the draft proposal presented in that
> document giving so much decisional power to unknown individuals.
> * Agree with this; on a related note: those accounts have currently
> all build config / build permissions, some kind of permission
> revocation policy is needed (evilham)
>
-----------------------------------------
@jaromil . . . The meeting notes refers two questions specifically to
you - one regarding facilitating updates for the website (priority) and
one related to governance (long-term discussion needed).
Hoping for a response before the end of August. Perhaps you could add
it to your 'thinkering' todo list?
golinux