>    >>>> jaromil . . . At the risk of volunteering Evilham without 
> asking
>       first, I would like to suggest that you give him access to update
>       the website according to your current method.  He and I work well
>       together.  Then you will be relieved of that aggravation and the
>       website will benefit for having the most current information.
>       Seems like a win/win all around.   (golinux) *
>     * I'd be ok with this; may look into replicating the pipeline
>       locally at some point before Wednesday, that way a chrooted
>       SFTP-only access to update the site would suffice (evilham) *

>   >>>> jaromil - I have never seen the list of VUAs involved with 
> Devuan.
>     Are they the owner members here?

> https://git.devuan.org/devuan/devuan-repository-masters/settings/members
>     Many of them are unknown to me. At this point in our development, I
>     am not comfortable with the draft proposal presented in that
>     document giving so much decisional power to unknown individuals.
>   * Agree with this; on a related note: those accounts have currently
>     all build config / build permissions, some kind of permission
>     revocation policy is needed (evilham)