Le 21/08/2017 à 12:56, Didier Kryn a écrit :
> Le 20/08/2017 à 18:57, Renaud (Ron) OLGIATI a écrit :
>> On Sun, 20 Aug 2017 16:38:18 +0100
>> Rowland Penny <rpenny@???> wrote:
>>
>>> As far as I am aware, each network device should have a different MAC,
>>> couldn't this be used to identify which device is which ?
>> Could, but whenever you have to change a NIC after a thunderstorm you
>> are buggered...
>> Cheers,
>> Ron.
>> That's exactly the most frequent case. There's also the following
>> case: you break your computer but not the disk. Instead of making a
>> new install on another computer, you just exchange the disks. Your
>> network was configured for eth0 but there's no more eth0, udev has
>> renamed it eth1, because eth0 is the NIC of the broken computer.
>
> In any case the admin must either hack /etc/network/interfaces or
> the udev rules. But I think this little inconveniency is better than
> the meaningless device names promoted by Systemd people.
>
> Remains the problem of the namespace. Why not use nic0, nic1, etc
> as a namespace for ethernet?
>
> Didier
Sorry, thunderbird messed with citation. The paragraph after the
signature of Ron is from me.
Didier