On Sun, 20 Aug 2017 16:27:26 +0200, Adam wrote in message
<20170820142726.ojyrd6plsfjmcbp6@???>:

> But sticking with just kernel names would still be much better than
> the enp0s3 idea. It'd be _predictable_ in that 99% case; machines
> with multiple interfaces tend to be either routers (which come
> preconfigured) or servers (which have an admin who's supposed to have
> a clue).

..stay with kernel names. Write whatever tools needed to help
systemd etc victims recover their systems and sanity as they
come onboard with us.

--
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
Scenarios always come in sets of three:
best case, worst case, and just in case.