On 2017-08-17 13:01, Jaromil wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Aug 2017, golinux@??? wrote:
>
> Now I'm sorry to read you do not grasp the fact most of the work is
> not done by video-conferencing . . . yada, yada
>

You should really practice what you preach regarding passive aggression
and assigning dismissive judgments about the workings of another's mind.

>
> I think we should re-think the "conflict management" strategy taking
> place here, since scaling the heat of the debates with
> passive-aggressive remarks included in reports, since this is
> completely unnecessary drama.
>

It seems that anything you find 'challenging' is summarily dismissed as
'drama'. That's twice in as many days (and many times in the past in
other situations). If those involved in the current impasse would
communicate and collaborate on a solution, there would be no 'drama'.
Absence at the meets (which may or may not be in part boycott) is just
prolonging the uncertainly of the path that Devuan's infrastructure will
take. The fact that a few devs seem to have already decided what that
path will be is disturbing (see request below). And the fact that so
few on this list are part of the conversation is even more disturbing .
. . . . .

>
> I hope you find the time to focus on a
> priority pending for your participation to the new website setup, to
> make a GPG and an SSH key which we all have and need to have. I never
> ment to assign work to anyone but since we are at that..
>

That may or may not be necessary . . . Let's see how this all sorts out.

golinux