Hi Franco,

Can you please respond on this? What is the best way??

Daniel.

On 13/08/17 19:47, KatolaZ wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 02:34:27PM +0200, Jaromil wrote:
>> I believe only option B or C are desirable
>> since we do want to have cryptographic
>> traceability of the signing infrastructure
>>
>> also I agree B is the best option.
>>
>
> OK, if we go with option B (a subkey of the current key) who can
> generate a subkey for the new amprolla?
>
> If we go for option C (a brand-new key) we can generate the new key
> immediately and directly on the new amprolla instance.
>
> I guess that in both cases we must update devuan-keyring, right?
>
> Regards
>
> KatolaZ
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> devuan-dev internal mailing list
> devuan-dev@???
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devuan-dev
>


--
Daniel Reurich
Centurion Computer Technology (2005) Ltd.
021 797 722