On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 02:34:27PM +0200, Jaromil wrote:
> I believe only option B or C are desirable
> since we do want to have cryptographic
> traceability of the signing infrastructure
>
> also I agree B is the best option.
>

OK, if we go with option B (a subkey of the current key) who can
generate a subkey for the new amprolla?

If we go for option C (a brand-new key) we can generate the new key
immediately and directly on the new amprolla instance.

I guess that in both cases we must update devuan-keyring, right?

Regards

KatolaZ

-- 
[ ~.,_  Enzo Nicosia aka KatolaZ - GLUGCT -- Freaknet Medialab  ]  
[     "+.  katolaz [at] freaknet.org --- katolaz [at] yahoo.it  ]
[       @)   http://kalos.mine.nu ---  Devuan GNU + Linux User  ]
[     @@)  http://maths.qmul.ac.uk/~vnicosia --  GPG: 0B5F062F  ] 
[ (@@@)  Twitter: @KatolaZ - skype: katolaz -- github: KatolaZ  ]