Am 12/08/2017 um 19:40 schrieb KatolaZ:
> On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 07:57:40AM +1200, Daniel Reurich wrote:
>
> [cut]
>
>>> you are imposing a dependency on your actions to all of us without
>>> even giving a fair consideration to what has been done.
>>
>> No, I'm simply saying don't acceot a solution born out of frustration
>> that came from ignorance of what already is there.
>
> Keeping saying that I don't understand the current building infra does
> not make your point stronger or more clear. You did't even bother to
> explain what I am not understanding there, despite I have asked
> several times for that explanation. I understood what was possible to
> understand given the structural lack of documentation that
> characterises almost everything in the Devuan infrastructure, but I am
> really eager to understand what I am missing.

Dear KatolaZ, this also does not help.

Let's focus everyone on improving what is on the pad now.

If that means I got something wrong then by all means (and this is not
directed to you but to everyone) instead of telling me how wrong I am,
just go over the pad and put the correct information in place.

In the worst case, let's turn this into a documentation of what we have;
one that is accurate and up-to-date and start with that towards solving
the identified issues.
--
Evilham