El 11/08/17 a les 07:43, Didier Kryn ha escrit:
> Le 10/08/2017 à 16:22, Jamey Fletcher a écrit :
>>> Le 09/08/2017 à 22:46, Joel Roth a écrit :
>>> Despite what the author claims, this series of pages isn't about
>>> init. It is mostly about supervision and a little about containers. It
>>> assumes both are usefull, with no argumentation to motivate supervision.
>>> Confusion about init, supervision, and containers typically suggests
>>> that the author has been contaminated by systemd propaganda.
>>> Also I don't like the style of this series of explanations; there
>>> is little content within a lot of decoration and structure. Clearly the
>>> author has tried all these supervisors but his explanations could be
>>> more detailed.
>> And the answer is...
>>
>> Take what he's written, add in your thoughts, more clearly specify the
>> differences between inits, supervisors, hypervisors, and containers, and
>> write up your own explanation.
>>
>> One thing I might suggest, since you think his explanations could be more
>> detailed, is do a short explanation for each section, kind of an
>> executive
>> summary, and then add in a section closed up initially for more detail
>> for
>> those who need it.
>>
> I thing you're taking me wrong. I don't claim I know the matter
> better that the author. He studied all these supervisors in some detail;
> I didn't. I just say he failed to explain things in an educative way -
> and it seems to me doesn't consider it worth.
>
Something has to be done (written)
::
Re: [DNG] Technical overview of ini…
