:: Re: [DNG] Linus can no longer trust…
トップ ページ
このメッセージを削除
このメッセージに返信
著者: Steve Litt
日付:  
To: dng
題目: Re: [DNG] Linus can no longer trust "init"
What did Linux mean by "init"? A lot of people use the word "init"
synonomously with sysvinit, in which case this would appear to be bad
news for us. On the other hand, perhaps he use "init" to mean the init
system, regardless of brand. I can't tell from context.

SteveT


On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 08:57:33 -0700
Bruce Perens <bruce@???> wrote:

> The entire paragraph is even more damning:
>
> And yes, a large part of this may be that I no longer feel like I can
> trust "init" to do the sane thing. You all presumably know why.
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 7:20 AM, Emiliano Marini
> <emilianomarini82@???
> > wrote:
>
> > I no longer feel like I can
> > trust "init"
> >
> >
> >
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/7/6/577
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Dng mailing list
> > Dng@???
> > https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
> >
> >