On 07/05/2017 10:46 AM, Ivan J. wrote:
> That clause itself is not a big problem, but IMHO it should rather be
> moved to the README file or something similar rather than the license
> itself where it actually *is* putting restrictions and in the case of
> FSF would not be considered free software.

It seems that you got your wish.

https://git.devuan.org/DPA/sd_journal_shim/commit/51455a60b824cf0a383f6a456c90c9e8b55df967

Patrick