On Wed, 5 Jul 2017 at 13:37:43 +0100
KatolaZ <katolaz@???> wrote:

[...]

> I totally agree that the best thing would be for DPA to change the
> license to a regular Expat/MIT (i.e., by removing that clause), and it
> is evident now that we are all on the same page.

He might release it under a dual licence:

1) systemd-encumbered distributions: the licence stays the way it is;
2) systemd-free distributions: the systemd journal API clause is forgone.