Quoting Alessandro Selli (alessandroselli@???):

> It is relevant in proving you cannot do that and *lawfully* distribute the
> module, which is what I have kept saying.

Indeed, you do keep trying to change the topic to distribution. But I
already pointed that out. ;->

> I am not turning it into it, I am keeping it into it.

That's simply not what you said upthread.

> Your opinions were pretty clearly stated.

Again, I expressed _no_ view concerning distribution, as that was not the
matter under discussion.