On Tue, 9 May 2017 08:57:47 -0400, Hendrik wrote in message
<20170509125746.GA24296@???>:
> On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 11:01:45AM +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> > On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 10:47:08AM +0200, Didier Kryn wrote:
> > > Le 08/05/2017 10:42, Tomasz Torcz a écrit :
> > > > On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 09:41:06AM +0200, Joachim Fahrner wrote:
> > > > > I found another package that depends on libsystemd0:
> > > > > sane-utils. Would it be difficult to remove this dependency,
> > > > > or is there a valid reason for having this?
> > > > It easy to remove, there's a configure switch:
> > > > https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/sane/sane-backends.git/commit/?id=c4ae327be5ccf762fe7bb3c1e7f12e13f6b6a1d1
> > > >
> > > > The integration of logging and socket-activation in systemd
> > > > environments seem to be optional:
> > > > https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/sane/sane-backends.git/commit/?id=39545b1b90dd9c9e12c20f02cf4ead3afac20de9
> > > >
> > >
> > > I thought Sane was a bare application. Does it involve also
> > > some kind of server to "need" socket-activation and logging?
> > >
> >
> > http://linuxcommand.org/man_pages/saned8.html
>
> So... does sane need saned? Do the scanners have to initiate
> communication with the computer for which there always has to be a
> daemon running?
>
> -- hendrik
..maybe if you bought a toll bridge from some Nigerian prince and try
feed license plate numbers off surveillance cameras to the cops for
laughing at you... ;o)
--
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
Scenarios always come in sets of three:
best case, worst case, and just in case.