Autor: Miles Fidelman Data: A: dng Assumpte: Re: [DNG] Which is Free, Which is Open Source,
is there any difference?
On 4/25/17 9:03 PM, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 08:27:16PM -0400, Miles Fidelman wrote:
>> Free Software means just that: You don't have to pay anything to use it.
>> There's all kinds of stuff out there where object code is free to download
>> and use, but source is not available. (And there are degrees of Free - such
>> as "free for non-commercial use only."
> Uhm, you've somehow failed to notice all the talk about "free as in speech"
> vs "free as in beer". In this case, it is strictly the former. The GPL
> explicitly allows charging a fee, the DFSG forbid any restrictions on
> commercial activity, including _selling_ the software. You just can't stop
> your recipient from distributing it further.
>
> "Free for non-commercial use only" is not free, it's at most gratis.
And here I thought we were talking about licenses, and the range of
terms included in different ones. The GPL is far from the only license
applied to software.
Miles Fidelman
--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra