On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 11:46:04AM +1200, Daniel Reurich wrote:
> As per my comments on #devuan-dev
>
> I was somewhat dissappointed in what appears to be a somewhat premature
> 1.0 Release Candidate. There were a number of obvious failures to adopt
> a process with proper checks and a consensus around the decision to release.
>
> In my opinion the direct issues are:
>

[cut]

>
> There are other issues, like who should be involved in the release
> decisions and on what areas of responsibility.
>
> Much to think about, and much to do.

Hi Dan,

many good points. Shall we have a dev meeting this week, e.g. on
Wednesday at 8pm UTC?

I am happy RC is out, BTW. Everything can be improved ;)

My2Cents

KatolaZ

-- 
[ ~.,_  Enzo Nicosia aka KatolaZ - GLUGCT -- Freaknet Medialab  ]  
[     "+.  katolaz [at] freaknet.org --- katolaz [at] yahoo.it  ]
[       @)   http://kalos.mine.nu ---  Devuan GNU + Linux User  ]
[     @@)  http://maths.qmul.ac.uk/~vnicosia --  GPG: 0B5F062F  ] 
[ (@@@)  Twitter: @KatolaZ - skype: katolaz -- github: KatolaZ  ]