On Wed, 19 Apr 2017 18:54:07 +0200, Arnt wrote in message
<20170419185407.228cd18a@???>:

> On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 02:21:53 +1000, Ralph wrote in message
> <d3a264ce-a767-dffc-845d-d1eb26027a3e@???>:
>
> >
> >
> > Arnt Karlsen wrote on 19/04/17 23:17:
> > [cut]
> > >
> > > ...wiped udev off my box and wound up with a box that boots oh soo
> > > fine until it tries to load my new vdev
> > > initrd.img-4.9.0-2-rt-amd64 ...am I the first one here to try this
> > > on a rt kernel?
> > >
> > > ..recovery ideas? Do we have any vdev live-cd?
> > >
> > > ..last time I did this stunt, I chrooted in off a Knoppix? iso,
> > > I have memdisk and a few iso links handy in /boot, and Debian's
> > > Sid vmlinuz-4.8.0-2-amd64, vmlinuz-4.8.0-2-rt-amd64 and
> > > vmlinuz-4.9.0-1-rt-amd64 with systemd-udev initrd's, but they all
> > > depend on a working install of udev AFAIK, and I'd prefer pushing
> > > thru with vdev rather than going back to udev.
> > >
> > > ..has anyone here tried downgrading to Debian Wheezy era udev?
> > >
> > >
> > > ..looking for recovery live-cd idea starting points, I came across
> > > 32-bit
> > > https://debiandog.github.io/doglinux/zz02debiandogwheezy.html
> > > which could work both as a starting point for a live-cd and as a
> > > starting point for an upgrade path for stuck Debian Wheezy people
> > > via "Devuan-0.x Wheezy" to current Devuan-1.x Jessie.
> > >
> > > ..according to https://debiandog.github.io/doglinux/ "DebianDog is
> > > very small Debian Live CD shaped to look and act like Puppy Linux.
> > > Debian structure and Debian behaviour are untouched and Debian
> > > documentation is 100% valid for DebianDog. You have access to all
> > > debian repositories using apt-get or synaptic.", creating
> > > "Devuan-0.x Wheezy Live-CD" etc is trivial, toss their repos for
> > > ours, update, upgrade and remaster, the 64-bit version likely
> > > needs to be built off deb-src lines.
> > >
> > >
> > > ..but first comes the classic chicken-and-egg 64 bit recovery
> > > I need now. ;o)
> > >
> >
> > I'm not sure it helps you, but I've made a vdev variant of most
> > recent devuan_jessie_RC_amd64_minimal_live.iso (time stamped
> > 2017-Mar-27 20:57) that I got from the official mirror
> > http://mirror.sfo12.us.leaseweb.net/devuan/
> >
> > I purged a couple of things from it, then added and installed "my"
> > vdev_0.1.1_amd64.deb, and made a refractasnapshot of this, into
> > devuan_jessie_RC_amd64_minimal_live_vdev.iso, which is downloadable
> > at https://www.uk.realsam.co.uk/files/devuan/
> >
> > It boots with vdev rather than udev, and udev remains installed,
> > though with all its "competing" files tucked away. As you might
> > know, this vdev packaging is different from aitor's packaging for
> > gnuinos by not declaring a udev competition, but rather attempting
> > to manage a dynamic choice of which one is in use. The software is
> > otherwise the same, I believe.
>
> ..thanks, we shall find out. ;o)

..no joy this far, vdev does not work with any of my installed kernels,
neither my dpkg variant of your vdev-assistant nor your original
restores udev, so I'm stuck with live-CDs when I need to go online to
chk things to read up on.

..you packaged your vdev differently than aitor, do I then use
your deb(-src) lines in /etc/apt/sources.list and comment out
his?

..another approach is ignore apt and dpkg, and simply drop in all
files with tar or cpio or somesuch, haven't done that kinda stunt
since my RH-5.2 days.

..if that fails, are you able to build me an old fashion monster
monolithic kernel with nouveau, vdev and everything else compiled
into the kernel, and not as modules, that I can boot without an
initrd?
Big size is no problem, I have 8GB ram, but no build box.

..if not, what do I need to build a vdev kernel myself on my
box running your devuan_jessie_RC_amd64_minimal_live_vdev.iso?


--
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
Scenarios always come in sets of three:
best case, worst case, and just in case.