On 14.04.2017 12:29, Simon Hobson wrote:

> But I also recognise that others aren't happy and if they want to
> use something else then that's OK by me - as long as what they
> propose isn't something that "infects" stuff I want to run under
> SysVInit.

Exactly my goal. sysvinit users would probably just have the minimal
version installed, that doesn't do more than a tiny bit syslog()'ing,
others may install more complex versions fitting the service monitor
of their choice.

--mtx