:: Re: [Libbitcoin] RPM status + side-…
Página Inicial
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Autor: mlmikael
Data:  
Para: Alice Wonder
CC: libbitcoin
Assunto: Re: [Libbitcoin] RPM status + side-track
Michael,

It is difficult or impossible to distinguish your email from noise or
spam.

If you had an actual enquiry please state it clearly.

Mlmikael

On 2017-04-03 23:48, Alice Wonder wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> The RPM spec files are coming. The issue right now is simply space.
>
> I have a 128 GB SSD that was *mostly* empty but not empty enough, it
> got to 95% full before I killed the syncing.
>
> I order a 256 GB Intel SSD from Amazon but even though the invoice
> says SATA III they sent me a M.2 and I didn't return it because what
> they sent me is actually better than what I ordered. I asked them if I
> could keep it and they said sure.
>
> So anyway I have to find a low-profile pci-e card for M.2 and I think
> that's better anyway because I can get one that supports two and buy a
> larger one in future if/when needed. I want to research them first,
> make sure I get one that works well with stock CentOS kernel etc.
>
> So that's the delay in the RPM spec files. Part of it.
>
> -=-
>
> The other part is I have been brainstorming for a potential alt-coin.
> I am not happy with where Bitcoin is going. To me the refusal for
> increasing blockchain smells like artificial scarcity of a resource
> and creating artificial scarcity of a resource is something I see as a
> mechanism those with wealth use to leech more money from those
> without, and I suspect that is the goal, with the additional leeching
> to take place on the second-level off-chain networks that Blockstream
> has filed numerous software patents for.
>
> But on the other hand I am not really satisfied with BU either, for
> several reasons I won't detail, though I am running the BU client
> currently.
>
> I've been brainstorming an alternative coin, with protocol level
> facilities for scheduled hard-forks including a mechanism for smoothly
> dealing with contentious hard forks should they become an issue.
>
> I'm still brain-storming, but if I go forward I would probably want to
> initially fork libbitcoin to use as the library a reference client is
> built against.
>
> A PDF (built from LaTeX which is what I use for all my word-processing
> needs) describing it is at
> https://leprecoin.org/LepreCoin-20170403.pdf
>
> It's not bitcoin but any feedback would be appreciated.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Michael A. Peters (aka Alice Wonder)
> _______________________________________________
> Libbitcoin mailing list
> Libbitcoin@???
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libbitcoin