On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 11:44:31AM -0500, golinux@??? wrote:
> On 2017-03-26 04:20, Jaromil wrote:
> >On Sun, 26 Mar 2017, KatolaZ wrote:
> >
> >>And to be clear once and for all: I am not in love with debbugs. I
> >>believe we need something that works first, and then we can improve on
> >>that.
> >
> >indeed! and while we can slowly improve our installation, it is very
> >good to have it functional. debbugs was a early request of debian
> >developers we interacted with at the beginning of the fork
> >declaration, arguing that if they were to swap camp then the tooling
> >should stay the same to accomodate a well established workflow.
> >
>
> Point well taken. We definitely want to be welcoming to an exodus of Debian
> devs. :) Since I run stable, bugs are unlikely to be an issue for me
> anyway. Hopefully, there will eventually be a list like this to browse
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgindex.cgi?indexon=pkg which comes in
> handy at times.
>


The cgi scripts are there. We are just waiting to double- and
triple-check them before we put them online.

It's the same system used by Debian. Exactly the same :)

HND

KatolaZ

-- 
[ ~.,_  Enzo Nicosia aka KatolaZ - GLUGCT -- Freaknet Medialab  ]  
[     "+.  katolaz [at] freaknet.org --- katolaz [at] yahoo.it  ]
[       @)   http://kalos.mine.nu ---  Devuan GNU + Linux User  ]
[     @@)  http://maths.qmul.ac.uk/~vnicosia --  GPG: 0B5F062F  ] 
[ (@@@)  Twitter: @KatolaZ - skype: katolaz -- github: KatolaZ  ]