Il giorno Wed, 04 Jan 2017 05:53:56 -0500
Dan Purgert <dan@???> ha scritto:

> Quoting Alessandro Selli <alessandroselli@???>:
>
> > On Tue, 3 Jan 2017 at 22:03:47 +0000 Arnt Gulbrandsen
> > <arnt@???> wrote:
> >
> >> Alessandro Selli writes:
> >>> This still doesn't explain why they decided to force-feed Google's DNS
> >>> server on the user without prompting the poor fellow any possible
> >>> choice.
> >>
> >> "Your network sucks. Do you want to [ ] use google or [ ] just give up?"
> >
> >   "Your network stinks.  What DNS servers do you want to use?
> >
> > [...]
> > [ ] Pick random ones
> > [ ] Pick the geographically closest ones
> > [ ] No DNS configuration now
> >
> >  Given there is choice, why artificially limit people's possibility to
> > choose how to skrew their networking up they way they enjoy it most?  :-)
> > BTW, I'd set FoolDNS as the default choice! ;-)
>
> I counter that these three (or at least "no config now") should be on
> top of the list.

Well yes, this is much better:

[ ] Pick random ones
[ ] Pick the geographically closest ones
[ ] Show a list of public DNS servers to choose from
[ ] No DNS configuration now

What do you think?


--
Alessandro Selli http://alessandro.route-add.net
VOIP SIP: dhatarattha@???
Chiavi PGP/GPG keys: B7FD89FD, 4A904FD9