:: Re: [DNG] Cacti version 0.8.8b fail…
Page principale
Supprimer ce message
Répondre à ce message
Auteur: Alessandro Selli
Date:  
À: dng
Sujet: Re: [DNG] Cacti version 0.8.8b fails communicaction with SNMP agent
Il giorno Thu, 1 Dec 2016 17:28:03 +0300
Aldemir Akpinar <aldemir.akpinar@???> ha scritto:

> On 1 December 2016 at 17:21, Alessandro Selli <alessandroselli@???>
> wrote:
>
> >   Hello people,
> >         I'm writing on this ML about this issue I've had with cacti before
> > I'll be able to edit https://git.devuan.org/devuan-packages (if
> > ever :-).
> >   The version of Cacti that ships with Jessie (0.8.8b) just wouldn't talk
> > (or listen) to the SNMP agent.  There is nothing wrong with the SNMP
> > agent, as snmpget and snmpwalk work just fine from the command line.
> > However, if on
> > cacti's web interface I set "Downed Device Detection" to "SNMP Uptime" it
> > would always report "Status - Down".  Uptime detection does not involve
> > the DB and Apache/PHP do not show any malfuction, so the problem must lay
> > with Cacti itself.  As I have a Fedora 24 available, I tried the same
> > configuration on that machine.  It worked just fine.

> >
> > Devuan 1.0 Jessie installs:
> > ii  cacti          0.8.8b+dfsg- all          web interface for graphing of
> > mon

> >
> > Fedora 24 installs:
> > cacti-0.8.8h-1.fc24.noarch
> >
> > Log file /var/log/cacti/cacti.log reports:
> >
> > 11/30/2016 04:55:03 PM - CMDPHP: Poller[0] WARNING: SNMP Get Timeout for
> > Host:'localhost', and OID:'.1.3.6.1.2.1.1.3.0' 11/30/2016 04:55:03 PM -
> > CMDPHP: Poller[0] Host[1] SNMP: Host did not respond to SNMP
> >
> > And yet:
> >
> > [alessandro@wrkstn03 ~]$ snmpget -v 2c -c "$ROCOMMUNITY"
> > localhost .1.3.6.1.2.1.1.3.0
> > iso.3.6.1.2.1.1.3.0 = Timeticks: (122187)
> > [alessandro@wrkstn03 ~]$
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Dng mailing list
> > Dng@???
> > https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
>
>
>
>
> Hi Alessandro,
> I know this is not very helpful, but, cacti is virtually a dead project
> (still no 0.9 for about 10 years and still waiting). I suggest using
> librenms which is much better and useful. (http://www.librenms.org/)


A few days ago I also noticed this project:
http://www.monitorix.org/
I think I'm going to try it, too.


Regards,


Alessandro