Dear Jaromil,

On 07/11/16 10:50, Jaromil wrote:
> you are right, devuan-discuss never took off. it also did not receive
> much love from any admin and I believe is stuck with some moderation
> bit noone has attended. It is a failed plan which I suggest we
> interpret as part of the "Beta" as much as other technical issues are.

It is a good think to remind that Beta phase also means the project is
settling its infrastructure, its communication channels, ... It is not
always obvious for everyone, me first.


> I will update the webpage accordingly, indicating the talk.devuan.org
> webforum and the DNG mailinglist as the main places for discussion,
> but also the git.devuan.org issues as the place where to report bugs.

Once updated, it would probably be a good thing to inform the people on
devuan-discuss they'd better move to the DNG ml.


> as we are settling a meaningful communication architecture for all,
> analysis and recommendations like yours are very welcome. We will also
> think of a standard practice for requesting to open a new mailinglist,
> something like a request backed by 10 or more active members and 2
> volunteering for facilitation. I guess the devuan-discuss ml lacked
> this sort of support, was thought and created top-down and therefore
> it failed to take-off properly.

Thank you for sharing the plan and ideas on the futur communication
channels.

I haven't been active on the ML however I am subscribed to it since the
beginning and I have been following all of you since then.

Thanks to all the people who have invested their effort in Devuan so far.

Best regards,
Giovanni