On Wed, 2016-08-24 at 09:32 -0500, Jim Murphy wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 12:20 AM, Steve Litt <slitt@???>
> wrote:
> > 
> > Any opinions on which to choose?
> Don't know if this would make any difference to you or not, but the
> Linux kernel is released under the GPLv2 only license(AFAICT). I
> remember there being quite a bit of debate about this when the
> GPLv3 license was coming out.  I personally don't know much
> about Expat, so I won't offer any opinion on it.
>
> The scripts I write I use GPLv2 only. "I" can change it later if I
> need to.

If you don't write any code directly related to (to be included in) the
GNU/Linux kernel, which unfortunately is GPLv2 only, can you please consider
using GPLv3+ (or at least GPLv2+) for future contributions?