--------------------------------------------
On Fri, 8/19/16, fsmithred <fsmithred@???> wrote:

Subject: Re: [DNG] Distrowatch Devuan poll do-over
To: dng@???
Date: Friday, August 19, 2016, 1:06 PM

On 08/19/2016 01:31 PM, Steve Litt wrote:
>> On Fri, 19 Aug 2016 13:55:49 +0000 (UTC)
>> Go Linux <golinux@???> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 8/19/16, Adam Borowski <kilobyte@???> wrote:
>>
>>> What's the point of a poll that's stuffed with votes from one side?
>>>
>>
>>> What's the point of any poll or election? I imagine that would
>>> depend whether you agree with those doing the 'stuffing'. ;) Why
>>> shouldn't it be those of us supporting Devuan?
>>>
>>> golinux
>>
>> Well said!
>>
>> Whether it's intentional sabotage or ballot stuffing, I'm a lot more
>> likely to retain a high sense of dignity and ethics if my opponents are
>> playing by the rules.
>>
>> Or, as one of the characters in "Lucifer's Hammer" says toward the end
>> of the book, "A society adopts the ethics they can afford."
>>
>> SteveT
>>
_______________________________________________

> For anyone who's interested in the results before they got wiped, what I
> recall is that around half said they would never try it, a quarter said
> they'd try it later.
>
> Among those who had tried it, three times as many said it was ready than
> said it needed a lot of work. And those who said in needed a little work
> were between the other two groups.
>
> For raw numbers, the only one I remember is that 12 said it was ready. I'm
> a little slow with math, so I'll stop here.
>
> -fsr

That last number was at least 120 - maybe a typo? My click was #70!

golinux