On 04.08.2016 02:06, Daniel Reurich wrote:
> So should we respond by saying that "We don't use or encourage the use
> of systemd-shim in Devuan. Our approach is to rebuild the packages
> which in debian depend on systemd, without that dependency instead."

Maybe also add:

"systemd-shim is only an *intermediate* workaround, until all the
systemd-infected packages are fixed."


--mtx