On 07/30/2016 02:57 PM, Rick Moen wrote:
> Quoting Simon Walter (simon@???):
>
>> Which is why it could be construed that you disagree with a fork of
>> Debian - a for of Debian as in "A fork of Debian that could be said
>> to have been started because the default init system in Debian
>> became systemd." - that fork of Debian - not a theoretical fork.
>
> You know, if you are going to call 'In my opinion, the goals of this
> project could have been achieved through less-arduous means' _opposition_
> to the project -- a project I explicitly like and appreciate -- then
> that is fanaticism, IMO, and we have nothing more to discuss.

Isn't that what's being discussed? When did I say the things you said
were opposition for the Devuan Project?

Trying to explain why *some* people might see you a certain way after
you express that you don't understand why said people see you said way
is a little different than saying you are that way.

But never mind. You seem offended. So it was a bit pointless for me to
try. Sorry dude - (if I can call you that). Obviously I don't disagree
with what you said or we would be discussing those details and not what
appears to me to be social matters.

Where there is passion, there may be fanaticism. What am I doing trying
to explain any further? I must be insane. ;)

>
> Fortunately, I am reasonably certain you don't speak for the Devuan
> Project in this regard.
>

Fortunately, I do not speak for the Devan Project in any regard except
as a recommendation to some other admins who have utter curses towards
systemd within ear shot.

A good day/night to you sir!

Simon