Quoting Simon Walter (simon@???):

> Which is why it could be construed that you disagree with a fork of
> Debian - a for of Debian as in "A fork of Debian that could be said
> to have been started because the default init system in Debian
> became systemd." - that fork of Debian - not a theoretical fork.

You know, if you are going to call 'In my opinion, the goals of this
project could have been achieved through less-arduous means' _opposition_
to the project -- a project I explicitly like and appreciate -- then
that is fanaticism, IMO, and we have nothing more to discuss.

Fortunately, I am reasonably certain you don't speak for the Devuan
Project in this regard.

-- 
Cheers,             Grossman's Law:  "In time of crisis, people do not rise to
Rick Moen           the occasion.  They fall to the level of their training."
rick@???          http://linuxmafia.com/~rick/lexicon.html#grossman
McQ! (4x80)