Rick Moen <rick@???> writes:
> Quoting Rainer Weikusat (rweikusat@???):
>
>> That's neither 'abstract' nor 'teleological' as you yourself nicely
>> demonstrated by immediately coming up with an equivalent but different
>> term after reinterpreting my statement in a way it clearly wasn't meant
>> to be understood by exploiting ambiguities inherent in natural language.
>
> Seems pretty darned teleological and abstract to me.

I didn't expect you to stop the attempt to get a 'religious angle' into
this just because I pointed out that your interpretation was completely
wrong.