> I don't believe in anarcho-pacifism. I believe in anarcho-capitalism, or
> agorism. And countereconomics.

Let me expose some ideas on this way, because I think people is really
confuse in general with that.

I am listening that "anarcho-capitalism" word to describe a political
way I think from 10 years ago. And I cannot see how this can be done.

I have some friends that declared themselves as "anarcho-capitalists".

How is that possible?.

Anarchy is a theoretical/practical method to organize individuals and
communities and capitalism is an economic system.

To have that ideas together has no sense, from a pure anarchist mind.

If we admit "anarcho-capitalism" as a form of anarchism, where are the
"anarcho-parlamentarism" or "anarcho-socialism" or even, on a economical
way, "anarcho-handtraders"...

Is not same to said: "I am a crypto-anarchist", because cryptography is
a tactical way and anarchism an strategy (long time method).

They can both together and still has sense. Like "anarcho-pacifism".

But capitalism?...

Anarchy doesn't realize power as method. And capitalism is giving that
power to an economical (no humanistic) theoretical system. This is a
kind of oxymoron from a leftist point of view.

I think that this people, that curiously tend to manage free software
companies, "social" business, use bitcoin for speculation, gambling,
etc.. ignore that old liberalism theories (ex: Tatcher, Reagen, etc..)
wants exactly the same that them: "No states (no regulation) + only
market rules".

Don't confuse yourself from an anarchist point of view with capitalism.

Capitalism is your enemy.

You will cannot practice never anarchism by using capitalism. You always
will be subjugated to market rules which are really anti-socials.

I think that "anarcho-capitalism" is hiding an egocentric,
individualistic behavior on it, that is better described using:
"anarcho-individualism".

> You see where all these are going? All these technologies empower the
> people to be free, and restrict governments to control people.

This was said by Marx a long time ago. Did you read "The Capital"?. He
is explaining there at some chapters an utopia theory in which humans
can dedicate their life to expand knowledge and machinery takes the hard
work. This is not invented by computer hackers theories.

So, you are describing a kind of "anarcho-marxism", also described by
Asimov like "social technocracy". It is not new and of course, it is not
related with "capitalism".

I like that ideas (like theories) but there a lot of variables that we
have nowadays that weren't described there.

For example, Bitcoin. Because this can be used by "anarcho-socialism"
but also by "anarcho-capitalism". Depending on how we manage that will
have a more Sathosi final goal related or not.

Because a "techno-fast-crypto-economy" ruled by banks and states can be
another big daemon to fight. Usually them force revolution symbols on a
reverse way. For example, Gandhi is at Indian money... Incredible!

I will like to see again to all self-declared "anarcho-capitalists" to
appears against from their caves to explain to the rest of anarchist
movement what is providing their theories more than noise and confusion...