I don't believe in anarcho-pacifism. I believe in anarcho-capitalism, or
agorism. And countereconomics.

Meaning, I believe we will stop government oppression, even wars, by
creating voluntary free market solutions that will make government laws and
regulations obsolete.

I'll give small simple examples from what has already happened, then
extrapolate my vision into the future.

You know there were a lot of copyright legal fights against P2P file
sharing. Edonkey and similar programs, and the companies that sold the
programs, have been sued and shot down. Then someone created bittorrent
protocol. And basically, copyright laws became obsolete and unenforceable.

There were a lot of "gun control laws" discussions in USA. One such law,
banning the sales of magazines with more capacity than 10 rounds, have been
obsolete, before it even passed congress. By 3-d printed guns initiative,
the defense distributed guys.

There were other talks of banning sales of AR-15's. Then "ghost gunner"
came into market, to mill AR-15 lower receivers at the push of a button. In
US, legally that part is the rifle. All other parts can be bought and sold
without any license or registration or limitation, but this part. Then you
can put all parts together to make your own AR-15.

The federal reserve in USA is fighting against cash, gold, silver, to be
used as money. They want everything to go through banks. So that they can
control everything financially, through the centralized banking system.
Then comes the bitcoin protocol. All of a sudden there is an alternative
that people can use. They don't have to use fiat money. And now there are
hundreds of more projects, different cryptocurrencies.

Then government tries to censor or control Internet. People realize freedom
of information and communication is an essential freedom, a foundation of
all other freedoms. Because "none is more hopelessly enslaved than those
who think they are free". People start a project to combine a free internet
with a free payment system and there comes Ethereum. And similar projects,
meshnets, darknets with similar goals. Now a total control of internet
information flow is almost impossible.

You see where all these are going? All these technologies empower the
people to be free, and restrict governments to control people.

Some day someone will make metal 3-d printer cheap. Then gun control laws
will totally be obsolete.

People can now make their tractors themselves, at 1/10 cost of a commercial
tractor:
See:
http://opensourceecology.org/


On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 6:54 PM, psy <epsylon@???> wrote:

> Well, I think that you are talking about different ideas than Amir,
> Jaromil,...
>
> >Your delusion is: "If an Anarchist was a King, everything would be
> >better".
>
> >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z0HtWSlFCAQ
>
> That video is nice for teens and people starting to discover anarchism.
>
> Basically it is about try to don't get engage to the power or
> participate and try to convince others to follow that doctrine. This is
> called anarcho-pacifism. And is a really nice theory but cannot be apply
> to real practice world. It is simple, because is based on that all
> population has a reasonable mind and can choose with similar criterion
> than others which nowadays is a fallacy. So it sounds good, but hasn't
> so much sense...
>
> We can talk about other anarcho-tactics. And some include politics as a
> tool, not as an end to reach. That's because individuals cannot fight
> alone against society problems and anarchism is general a very pragmatic
> knowledge. To give external support for some political parties is a
> need. Not a mod to be chosen..
>
> Take care also with individualism (ego) when you talk about that you are
> the only political subject of your life. Some liberalism theories
> approve that way. We should have some red lines between individuals and
> communities. And then should be really clear.
>
> Imagine that we go for your theory. Do you go to convince to violent
> people to stop being violent?. Are they gonna stop war because we talk
> with them?. We hope than yes. But probably this will not happen never.
>
> So we need to take down first a system of violence. And for that we have
> different ways. By using violence or by using politics. Occam style can
> solve it.
>
> Depending about your choice, we can talk more about "anarchism".
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>
>